|
1
|
- GRAPHITE DIE CASTING
- DIVISION
|
|
2
|
- The Evolution of GDC
- The GDC technology was developed as a hybrid of traditional permanent
mold, graphite mold and the die casting process in response to ongoing
demands from Engineers who were looking for a faster less expensive
means of developing and testing new products. The main challenge was
replicating the mechanical and physical properties of the production
intent alloys and having the flexibility to make changes as the designs
matured. The initial trials using A380 were carried out in1999, and
further development has yielded the process as it stands today. However,
given the nature of the process and the diversity of markets served it
is in a constant state of development as more challenging geometries are
being cast in the GDC process.
- It is the intention of Armstrong Mold to support further development to
expand the list of alloys and methods within the scope of the Graphite
Die-Casting process.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Utilize an alternative mold material that produces a new level of
casting
- CNC cavity detail to deliver production die cast tolerances
- Rapid solidification that ensures excellent mechanical and physical
properties and cell structure.
- Enable processing of 380 390 Aluminum alloys
- Capable of production in excess
of 50 to 100 castings per day
- Tooling in Days to Weeks Not Months
- Provide the capability of supporting bridge to production needs
|
|
5
|
- The GDC process was designed for utilization for both high quality
prototyping as well as low volume production applications.
- Prototyping
- Production tolerances
- Production like properties
- Quantity of parts in short time frame
- Ability to use parts for production machine fixture development
- Low Volume Production
- Lower capital investment for tooling
- Able to produce in smaller lot sizes
- Full machining capabilities and assembly
- Full finishing capabilities painting, plating, impregnation, X-ray and
pressure testing
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- AVERAGE PROJECT TIME-FRAME
- 3D Cad Files: Customer supplied Cast & Machined, Detailed Prints (1
day)
- Logging in of files and data including contract review (1 day)
- Job launch including Tooling design review (1 day)
- Programming of cutter paths (2-3 days)
- CNC machining of cavity, core and slides (2-4 days)
- CNC machining of runners and risers (1-2 days)
- Installation of vent posts and pins (1-2 days)
- Polishing of tool (1-3 days)
- Inspection of Cavity, Core and Slides (1 day)
- Assembly of tool including ejection (2-3 days)
- Sampling of Tooling (as cast part) (1-5 days)
- De-gating, Primary Grinding, Secondary Grinding (1 day )
- Machining of 1st article (3-7 days)
- Total 3-5 weeks
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Part Name: 5 parts 2 housings,
3 covers
- Part Size: 4.65 x 4.76 x 1.89
- Material: 390 Aluminum
- Quantity: 200 - 450 pcs of each part
- Tooling Cost: Housings- $7,600.00
each
Covers- $8,550.00 each
- Fixturing Cost: Housing- $875.00
- Covers- $1,125.00
- Part Cost: Housing- $128.03
- Covers - $140.58
- Delivery: 3 ½ weeks ( as cast ) 4 weeks ( machined)
- Notes: All parts were impregnated and pressure tested @ 100psi . Parts were
used as bridge to production after initial prototyping and design
changes were made.
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- CNC cut tooling
- Ability to cast thin walls
- Flexibility for use as prototype or low volume production option
- Rapid solidification cycles
- Complete in-house mold design and construction.
- High part to part repeatability
- Castings can be used to prove out assembly fixtures, trim dies or
machining fixtures.
|
|
23
|
- Aluminum and zinc parts in
- 3 - 5 weeks
- Semi-permanent mold will make hundreds of parts from one tool
- Ideal for 100-2000 parts
- Short run production
- Bridge from prototype process to production
- Cost effective
- Able to cast spec die-cast alloys-380, 390
- More accurate test results for tensile, yield, hardness
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|